Saturday, September 13, 2014

Break On Through To The Other Side

There are a plethora of ghost investigation and storytelling programs blanketing today's television and admittedly I am one of their devotees. I'm not a fan of the "When Ghosts Attack" or any of those strictly terrifying type shows, as they do scare the f*ck outta me.  I don't necessarily believe that ever location on every street, has a ghostly resident.  If you watch enough of these programs, you are lead to believe that there is an influx of homeless spirits, as if Heaven has a housing problem.

I don't know if I truly believe in a ghostly afterlife.  I've had a few experiences that would convince me there is, but in an effort to maintain some self reassurance (and preservation of sanity), I easily explain everything away, including simply shrugging off anything that can't be explained.  A few weeks back, I was playing with my cat in my basement.  He's been enthralled with the deep freeze I had delivered a couple of months back.  Every time I open it to retrieve something out, he's right there, trying to get in.  So in the midst of our play, I picked him up, opened the freezer and placed him inside.  I NEVER closed the lid.  I'd never do that to my little boy, but I wanted him to know what the deal was.  He'd only been inside for a second or two, when suddenly I was struck, dead center, in the back with some kind of heavy metal object.  I was the only person (other than the cat) down in that basement.  I grabbed my boy out of the freezer, closed the lid and swung around, staring into open space.  Nothing was there.  Nothing that could be seen with the naked eye.

There are negative spaces in my basement.  Cold spots, that according to the "professional" ghost investigators, can be attributed to the existence of ghosts.  Stealing all the positive energy from around them, in an attempt to manifest themselves or hurl inanimate objects at the unsuspecting living.  Then again, it is a basement.  Basements have cold spots.  It's an imperfect world.  I admit some concern, blindly looking about the basement, before shrugging my shoulders and made my exit.

I can't say for sure, whether there is or is not anything residing in my house.  It was only built in 1992, so it's not very old, but since moving in seven years ago, I've experienced weird little things, including seeing a black cat wander past the corner of my eye, years before I got my very own cat.  One of the things my cat does, is sit and look past me to something behind me, although there never seems to be anything there.  Or equally freaky, speaking of my basement, he will often wander into the basement and will sit attentively looking up at... nothing.  I've heard that pets and small children are able to see ghostly apparitions.  Both my nephews, on occasions as very small toddlers, have spoken of playing in the bedroom with grandpa.  Both of their grandfathers have been long since deceased, well before their births.

My guilty pleasures include Ghost Hunters, Ghost Adventures and the recently cancelled, Haunted Collector, which featured famed paranormal investigator, John Zaffis.  I am enthralled by the evidence that the investigators collect on their many many cases.  I love the fact that the fellas (and gals) on Ghost Hunters will debunk and reveal anything that is being faked or exaggerated, including the time they were invited to investigate a haunted restaurant and bar on the west coast, where it was reported that a ghostly face would appear in the bathroom mirror.  It was discovered that the mirror was back lit and most of the reported haunted spots in the establishment, was being faked by the owners.  I appreciate, as a fan, that they went ahead and aired that episode, as a "f*ck you" to anyone who attempts to poke fun or make light of their science.

Although, of the three programs that I listed, Ghost Hunters seems to be the more ridiculous of the trio.  Engulfed by the darkness, lit only in infrared green, investigators challenge the spirits to make a sound, then act all surprised and skeptical when their request is answered.  "Show us you're here by knocking three times on the wall."  Then they hear a muffled bump... bump... ...bump!  Suddenly, they're shocked, charging down the hall calling out, "Who did that?  Who's here?  Show yourselves!"  Why ask the spirits to do something then act all wild and f*cking nuts with they comply?

Ghost Adventures used to be an intriguing show.  The three participants would get locked into a location for the entire night, with absolutely no access to the outside.  If there were any ghosts and specters inside the house or structure where they were, they were stuck together whether they liked it or not.  Nowadays, they have free range, coming and going at their leisure.  If a situation gets too intense, they're free to leave and rest off-site.  Plus, the evidence they collect went from being scattered and infrequent to (now) getting compelling evidence, every f*cking time.  I still watch, but do so, now, tongue-in-cheek.  I make my own decisions on whether the evidence is real or not.

John Zaffis' Haunted Collector, was the more interesting show of them all.  He's of the believe that spirits or ghostly energy will attach themselves to objects, like an old hair brush or knives, blades or guns.  Bones have been discovered, as well old mirrors and even poisons.  A menagerie of objects were found during the short-lived series, as well as in his professional life, that were removed from the locations, resulting in the reduction or total disappearance of paranormal activity.  I liked the show.  It was interesting.

The most ridiculous of all the paranormal shows is Ghost Hunters International.  I've tried to watch the show in the past, hoping it'd be as interesting and fun as the original Ghost Hunters, but fails miserably.  Their investigators take all that shit SO f*cking serious, that fun is discouraged from investigations.  Part of the charm of Ghost Hunters is the fun and joking that is exchanged between Steve Gonsalves and Dave Tango, including Steve betting $10 to Dave to put stuff in his mouth.  Ghost Hunters International, never has these fun antics.  Instead, it's straight-laced, no-nonsense, take-themselves-too-f*cking-serious.  What bugs me more, though, is the international part of the show.

I know the title indicates that they investigate paranormal incidents across the globe, but what they fail to do is embrace the world cultures as they do their investigations.  Every paranormal-type show does is guilty of this, but you'd think that a program which embraces it's internationality, would enter the enterprise a little more realistically.  Last night, I recorded the Ghost Hunters International, mainly because Kris Williams, who began on the original Ghost Hunters, now appeared on GHI.  She is the second from the left in the picture up top.  She is very pretty and has big boobs.  Two attributes I appreciate in a woman (among other things -- I'm not completely shallow, but I am honest).

Last night's show, was the straw that broke the proverbial camel's back.  The crew were in American Samoa investigating claims that an ancient Samoan King haunted the grounds of a closed girl's school.  The premise, itself, sounds f*cking ridiculous.  Like a king doesn't have better things to do, than haunt a deserted learning facility.  During the program, locals are interviewed and maybe, 95% or better of them, aren't able to speak a lick of English.  I'm a little confused as to why the island is called American Samoa, if none of the motherf*ckers living there, can speak the f*cking language?  But I digress.  

None of them can speak English now, so suffice it to assume that NONE of them spoke any English two or three hundred years ago.  Yet, investigators venture out into the darkness and call out and do EVPs (Electronic Voice Phenomenon), all in English.  They received very little feedback.  Some, in the Samoan language, which I'm sure loosely translated into "What the f*ck are you saying?  Speak the language, motherf*cker!"  Especially rough, was the investigator, Joe Chin, the chubby Asian dude (the too-cool-for-school dude in the shades in the picture), who speaks like Elmer Fudd.  If I thought ancient Samoans had a rough time understanding the regular folks, trying to decipher the speech impediment of a virtual cartoon character, would be extremely difficult.  "If yo he-oh, show yo-say-uwf."

"If day-ohs any evidence, it-oh re-veo it-sewf du-wing analysis."  How ridiculous is it that grown-ass-adults still speak like this today?

I have some doubts that there is any sort of spirits residing in my house, or more specifically, my basement.  If I were a ghost, I'd plant myself in the living room and hope that the residents of my home shared my interest in television.  I love TV and would be content on spending eternity watching it, provided they stayed away from shit like The Bachelor, Grey's Anatomy or The Good Wife.  F*ck that shit.  That'd be Hell.  Spending eternity watching Paranormal shows and NCIS re-runs...  Now THAT, would be Heaven.

Tuesday, September 9, 2014

Sensible Values

When I die, I'd like to donate my brain to science.  Unfortunately, I wouldn't benefit from the science of learning what makes my mind tick, the root causes of why it meanders and thinks about the random shit that it does, but I'm sure it'd be an interesting read, nonetheless...

The latest random thought to pop into my nugget and stay like an unwanted house guest, refers to the "Little Red Riding Hood" story.  I have a plethora of thoughts that root themselves in my head and, thankfully, I have this avenue (Jeff's Brain Matter) to discuss and investigate these thoughts, and I promise to eventually get to many of these thought-provoking-subjects, but today, let's stick to Red Riding Hood.

Everybody knows the children's story of "Little Red Riding Hood".  Grandma's sick, so Little Red ventures out through a scary forest in a bad neighbourhood, wrought with hungry carnivores, with a basket full of baked goods, bound for granny's house.  She interacts with a terrifying wolf, who instead of viciously attacking a helpless little girl, comes up with an elaborate ruse to disguise himself as her grandmother, in order to capture and consume the unsuspecting youth, but before his plan can come to fruition, a local woodsman breaks in and (SPOILER ALERT) slews the hungry wolf, thus saving the day.

I question the logistics of the story.  One, irresponsibly sending a small child through a dense forest to grandma's house, alone and unprotected.  The story was written in the 17th century, so it's not as if mom and dad could've tossed Red into the back of the Honda and driven to grandma's, but surely people possessed some kind of common sense in relation to child safety.  Two, the riding hood.

Think about this.  Her name literally contained the garment that she wore, which I surmise means she wore that f*cking cloak ALL THE TIME, and why wear a riding hood?  Probably because she rode a horse and rode it A LOT.  This being said, why didn't she ride the horse to her grandmother's house?  The same dangers would exist, but she'd have a little more security riding atop a spirited steed.  But she didn't.  I suspect because Red's parents placed more value on the horse than the life and safety of their beloved daughter.  That's pretty f*cked up!!

The whole story sounds iffy, at best.  Even for a fabled story, written centuries ago, there's no lesson to be learned, but I have learned a thing or two: (i) Wolves are stupid and over-think every situation. (ii) Breaking and entering was an allowable offense by an axe-wielding maniac, if there's a life to be saved; which I think my be acceptable today. (iii) Parents in the 17th century, lacked sensible values.

**If grandma is prone to sickness, why the hell is she living in the middle of nowhere?

Wednesday, September 3, 2014

Babies Shooting Guns

I had an Atari 2600 when I was a kid.  Other kids poked fun at it's archaic technology, which failed considerably to the tech that their video game systems provided.  Ironically, as cheap and unfulfilling as the tech was then, it's greatly sought after today.  It's my belief, that there's a certain charm that accommodates the simplicity of the times.  An innocence that we've lost and are now in desperate search of.  The flash and speed of today's video games are awesome and heart-pounding, but sometimes it's nice to sit back for a relaxing game of Pong.  In simpler terms, going to the latest popular restaurant for an evening of gourmet dining is fantastic, but it's more enjoyable to settle down for some of grandma's apple pie and iced tea.

I had cap guns as a child.  I reveled in the smell of spent caps burning from the toy handgun after firing off a barrage of paper caps at imaginary foes.  Later on, I'd be gifted a plastic machine gun that you'd cock back the "firing mechanism" and it'd sound off a string of violent tones, like no other.  It even had a small red protruding mass at the end of the barrel to simulate fire.  It was a cool toy and I may even still have that kicking around somewhere in my basement, I think with my Star Wars figures.  Imagination was the key to fun playtime.

Today, it seems, imagination isn't enough.  Actually, when looked into deeper, I think kids who use an imagination are deemed defective, having some kind of mental deficiency that "professionals" need to aggressively address with mind-numbing medication.  I believe they've reassigned "imagination" as "Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD)"  Today, it seems that kids need more mental stimulation.  To be more hands on.  Case and point;  That poor nine year old girl last week who mistakenly shot her shooting instructor with an uzi.

Since then, there's been a nationwide debate on whether it's acceptable for a small child to be handling any kind of weaponry, let alone a freakin' uzi.  Gun freaks are standing firm that children need to learn how to use such weapons, insisting that the American Constitution decrees it so.  Being Canadian, I don't know exactly what all the Amendments decree or not, but given the advancement in the 227 years since it's inception, I'm sure some of the original amendments would be up for interpretation.  That being said, because I AM Canadian, chances are I have a greater handle on the subject than most Americans.  The Bill of Rights was enacted between 1787 and 1789, which was a completely different era.  The Second Amendment, the Right to Bear Arms, wasn't added until 1791 and at that time, everyone had single shot muskets.  I'm sure the Founding Fathers would be whistling a different tune today, if they came across the menagerie of mechanized destruction available to their citizens.  I'm sure they'd be busting out the Thesaurus and wording the amendment differently, so as not to be misconstrued by the borderline insane.  For sure, they wouldn't want today's mismanaged youth getting a hold of such weapons.

I've said it before and I will happily repeat this.  Unless there's a zombie apocalypse, there's really no need for ANY child to be picking up and firing off an assault weapon.  To do so, is completely insane.  We don't allow children to vote until the age of 18, because they're not educated enough to make an important decision like choosing the leader of the free world.  Children are not allowed to operate a motor vehicle until the age of 16, because it's believed their not coordinated enough to operate a sophisticated machine like a Buick or Toyota.  Yet, people believe a f*cking 9-year old girl should be intelligent and coordinated enough to proficiently operate an assault weapon..?  On Twitter this morning I came across a conversation between Anderson Cooper (@AC360) and Hollywood director, Judd Apatow (@JuddApatow), where the "This is 40" director argued that his "large for her age" six-year old shouldn't be discriminated against if she wishes to shoot a machine gun.  I hope he's only kidding, but if he's not, I hope his wife, Leslie Mann, slaps some sense into his head.

I know parents aren't in any hurry to have their kids grow up, and I believe that shooting real guns, will steal away their innocence, just as tragically as Father O'Brien's one-on-one tutoring sessions with little Billy after Sunday school.  As a kid, I liked the smell of freshly fired off paper cap gun strips.  So much so, that I would forgo the cap gun, spreading out the roll and using my dad's hammer to pop them off.  I doubt little Susie likes the air of GSR on her clothes after rattling out 50 rounds of 9mm shells.

As an adult, at my father's urging, I picked up a .22 rifle and shot a pigeon that was roosted in the old barn on the farm where I grew up.  I did not enjoy that experience, nor the guilt that I felt following it.  Another experience I had with a hand gun, was when I rung a door bell in Edmonton, Alberta.  The resident had been the victim of home invasion twice before and no longer took chances when a stranger rang his bell.  I was greeted with the largest barrel I've ever laid eyes on, pointed straight at me, aimed between my eyes.  The image to this day, still gives me debilitating shivers and nightmares.  Movies and video games have provided most of us with a fractured reality of what exactly these devices are and the reality of their destruction, completely disregarding the innocence that is lost in the process.

Given all the gun violence and school shootings in recent years, I can't wrap my head around the concept that "intelligent" people can't (or won't) support some kind of gun restriction or control to help regulate semi-automatic assault weapons.  It's inexplicable to me that their answer to gun violence is more guns.  And it blows my mind that they want their babies shooting right along side of them.

The Walking Dead is an amazing program.  I love every episode and never miss a single week, when it's on.  Have you noticed it takes place in the deep south?  I reckon it's because of the backward thinking of the rednecks.  Backward thinking like marrying your cousins and letting your pre-schoolers carry Mac-10 sub-machine guns in their backpacks. If there's a zombie outbreak in America, it's going to be a smorgasbord.  Nobody seems to be using their brains for much anyway.

Two hundred and twenty-seven years since the inception of the Bill of Rights...  How do we know the Founding Father's just wanted people to have the option to wear shirts without sleeves?  It's up for interpretation.